Pàgines

24 d’abr. 2025

Light bulbs have energy ratings — so why can’t AI chatbots?

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-02680-3


The recommendations

To achieve meaningful progress, it is essential that all stakeholders take proactive steps to ensure the sustainable growth of AI. The following recommendations provide some specific guidance to the variety of players involved.

Get developers involved. AI researchers and developers are at the core of innovation in this field. By considering sustainability throughout the development and deployment cycle, they can significantly reduce AI’s environmental impact from the outset. To make it standard practice to measure and publicly share the energy use of models (for example, in a ‘model card’ setting out information such as training data, evaluations of performance and metadata), it’s essential to get developers on board.

Drive the market towards sustainability. Enterprises and product developers play a crucial part in the deployment and commercial use of AI technologies. Whether creating a standalone product, enhancing existing software or adopting AI for internal business processes, these groups are often key decision makers in the AI value chain. By demanding energy-efficient models and setting procurement standards, they can drive the market towards sustainable solutions. For instance, they could set baseline expectations (such as requiring that models achieve at least two stars according to the AI Energy Star scheme) or support sustainable-AI legislation.

Disclose energy consumption. AI users are on the front lines, interacting with AI products in various applications. A preference for energy-efficient solutions could send a powerful market signal, encouraging developers and enterprises to prioritize sustainability. Users can nudge the industry in the right direction by opting for models that publicly disclose energy consumption. They can also use AI products more conscientiously, avoiding wasteful and unnecessary use.

Strengthen regulation and governance. Policymakers have the authority to treat sustainability as a mandatory criterion in AI development and deployment. With recent examples of legislation calling for AI impact transparency in the European Union and the United States, policymakers are already moving towards greater accountability. This can initially be voluntary, but eventually governments could regulate AI system deployment on the basis of the efficiency of the underlying models.

Regulators can adopt a bird’s-eye view, and their input will be crucial for creating global standards. It might also be important to establish independent authorities to track changes in AI energy consumption over time.

How much energy will AI really consume? The good, the bad and the unknown

 https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-025-00616-z







7 d’abr. 2025

How to build a circular economy for rare-earth elements

 





Superpowers want to control critical mineral supplies — local communities need a stronger say

 

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-025-00931-5? 






The race of superpowers to regulate access to ‘critical minerals’ — such as cobalt, copper, lithium and rare-earth elements — poses enormous challenges to global stability. These minerals are crucial ingredients in batteries, electronics, solar panels and computer chips. And demand for them is soaring: it will more than quadruple by 2040 for clean-energy technologies alone (see go.nature.com/3zHuGNm). The United States, China and Europe are taking drastic steps to secure their supplies. In January, US President Donald Trump issued executive orders to promote domestic mining and processing of these essential minerals, as he did during his first term and as his predecessor, Joe Biden, did, too. Trump has even offered to buy mineral-rich Greenland, to the dismay of Denmark, of which the island is a territory. And he is calling on Ukraine to relinquish a large chunk of its critical minerals to the United States as part of a peace deal with Russia.

Meanwhile, in December, China restricted exports of critical minerals to the United States after the latter blocked the transfer of chips to the former. China controls the supply chains, including the processing, of most critical minerals and is heavily invested in mining throughout Africa, Latin America and Central Asia. The United States and the European Union have tried to challenge China’s monopoly by securing their own mining contracts, including in the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Peru.

Risks of conflict, violence and crimes over these materials are growing. For instance, in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, conflicts have erupted in mineral-rich provinces such as Haut-Katanga and Nord-Kivu. These are being fuelled by neighbouring countries, such as Rwanda and Uganda, which are encouraging the smuggling of minerals across borders to enrich themselves. Illicit artisanal mining — small-scale operations with minimal equipment — is on the rise and has produced a tug of war between the authorities and citizens to claw these materials out of the ground.